On the 28th of January Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice celebrates its 200th Birthday. Recently I wrote an article on it for my student newspaper.
Jane Austen’s ‘darling child’ celebrates its bicentenary
Pride and
Prejudice, one of Austen’s most popular and arguably best-loved works,
celebrates its bicentenary this January. So arises the question, why are we
recognising this 200 year anniversary? What makes a novel, deeply routed in a time
of traditional nuclear families and gender restrictions, still relevant to us
today- in a world of increasing diversity, and single-parent families?
The playful
wit and social commentary of 19th Century Regency England are
imperative to critical scholarly debate, and contribute significantly to many
of Austen fans’ admiration, without, crucially, seeming anachronistic. As
evidenced through the number of homages, film adaptations and abundance of sequels,
there is undeniably something timeless about her writing.
Her plots
still feature in many of the nation’s favourite love stories and ‘chic flics’
today- think Bridget Jones’ Diary. The strength of this novel and its appeal
must be partly derived from the happy ending, the perfect love story.
Still, Pride
and Prejudice includes an awareness of hierarchical superiority, marital
necessity, and the plight of the poor. Perhaps it is thus the realism,
particularly with regards to the obstacles to love or happiness, which makes
for a novel that is still relevant- explored afresh in Bride and Prejudice (2004) with the introduction of a cultural hurdle.
Austen also includes
a variety of stereotypes - caricatures, even, that live amongst us in society
today. We have conceited Mr Darcy
juxtaposed with the benevolent Mr Bingley. Bingley respectively is a man who is ‘too nice’,
alongside the ‘bad boy’, Wickham. Elizabeth’s passion is contrasted with Jane’s
seeming reserve. Her characters are irresistible and engaging. The affecting and
occasionally disconsolate emotions evoked in the love story are interposed with
comical Mrs Bennett and even Lady Catherine De Burgh- the archetypal villain.
If that wasn’t enough, Mr Collins, the sycophantic skin crawl inducing man, is
depicted so vividly as to surely make him a contender for the least agreeable literary
husband of all time. Essentially, what is revealed is Austen’s greatest skill:
the formation of believable, three-dimensional, and timeless characters.
Even the National
Curriculum has failed to put off a generation of students from these books.
True, there are many who aren’t so enthusiastic and criticise Austen’s sparse
plot line in which ‘nothing happens’, but this does little to overpower the
popular admiration for the author and her works.
It seems that
Austen’s works are here to stay. Celebrations have been organised across the
country. The city of Bath is fully embracing its connection with her, and her
books, by hosting a ‘Readathon’ on the 28th January in which celebrities,
authors, politicians, and school children will read 10minute excerpts of her text. 2013 also boasts
a number of biographies as well as new editions of the novel.
Jane Austen,
200 years later, lives on not only in legacy, but in the constant reinvention of
her plot and the regeneration of her characters.
Heather